The Conversation - Climate Change Community

Nature: how do you put a price on something that has infinite worth?
Gallery
Nature: how do you put a price on something that has infinite worth?

Climate Emergency, Hope, Humanity, Nature

Nature: how do you put a price on something that has infinite worth?

By cCc|2021-02-07T01:09:53-05:00February 7th, 2021|Climate Emergency, Hope, Humanity, Nature|

There’s a new nature conservation strategy in town – and [...]

Comments Off

Here Are Five of The Main Reasons People Continue to Deny Climate Change
Gallery
Here Are Five of The Main Reasons People Continue to Deny Climate Change

Climate Emergency, News et Information

Here Are Five of The Main Reasons People Continue to Deny Climate Change

By cCc|2021-01-22T06:05:58-05:00December 1st, 2019|Climate Emergency, News et Information|

The fossil fuel industry, political lobbyists, media moguls and individuals [...]

Comments Off

“Missing” Words Matter

The IPCC’s Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C – Summary for Policymakers, states in section TS.2 Pg. 33 that:

…to achieve the goal of reaching “2050 net zero” and limit a dangerous overshoot of 1.5°C we need to reduce net anthropogenic (human caused) CO2 emissions by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching net zero by 2050.

Did you see what happened? Politicians have conveniently chosen to skip the part that stresses the urgent need to “reduce CO2 emissions by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030…”

This is a huge omission and manipulation of the meaning in the IPCC report. It minimizes the need for urgent and immediate action which is so vital to protecting us from an uncontrolled overshoot of 1.5°C. It’s not, choose your preference A or B, 2030 or 2050; those concepts and dates go together – it’s a linear relationship. A reduction in emissions by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 is on the path to B…”2050 net zero”…that’s how you get there. - Source